Question

北京大學2010年將試行由中學校長實名推薦的招生改革。被推薦的學生高考成績可獲得30分的加分。2009年11月16日北大公布了具有推薦資格的中學名單,其中福建省有6所。北大這一舉措在全國各地引起了激烈的爭論。請根據以下要點給《中國日報》寫一篇有關這場爭論的報導，并表達你對這場爭論的看法（至少兩點）。

支持方意見	反對方意見
1．是改革當前高考制度的大膽嘗試。 2．能確保高素質和有特殊才華學生進入一流大學。 3．促進中學重視學生的全面發展。	1．可能導致做假。 2．對全國許多中學不公平。 3．給被推薦的學生加分沒意義。
你的看法：1．……       2.  ……

注意：

1．對所給要點逐一陳述，適當發揮，不要簡單翻譯。

2．詞數至少120字。開頭已經寫好，不計入總詞數。

3．參考詞匯：大膽的bold

Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010.The recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

【答案】

 

Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010. The recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

Some people approve of this move. They think this is a bold attempt Peking University has made at reforming the current university entrance system. This move provides quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first-class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile, it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all-round development.

However, quite a few people object to the move. Firstly, it may lead to cheating. Secondly, only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students, which is unfair to so many schools across the country. Thirdly, there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students, for they are mostly top students and have no problem entering Peking University.

As far as I’m concerned, I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent, cheating is impossible. Besides, we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.

【解析】略